<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Fifth Third Bank Flunked Press Release Test from HubSpot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/</link>
	<description>How to turn prospects into buyers with content marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:31:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Newt Barrett</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/comment-page-1/#comment-6637</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/#comment-6637</guid>
		<description>Stacie,
Thanks for your comment. Although I purposely picked a very large bank that wouldn&#039;t feel any effect from my critique, I do take your point about the individual who may have written it. I was really aiming at the lack of news content in too many news releases. In this case, the corporate PR person was probably just following a company formula.  In fact, there was probably a hierarchy of people involved. I expect the each and/or all of them were simply retracing a well-trodden path.
These days, I think we all need to be more open to criticism and need to invite it to improve. That&#039;s part of conversational marketing. So, in that spirit, I certainly welcome yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stacie,<br />
Thanks for your comment. Although I purposely picked a very large bank that wouldn&#8217;t feel any effect from my critique, I do take your point about the individual who may have written it. I was really aiming at the lack of news content in too many news releases. In this case, the corporate PR person was probably just following a company formula.  In fact, there was probably a hierarchy of people involved. I expect the each and/or all of them were simply retracing a well-trodden path.<br />
These days, I think we all need to be more open to criticism and need to invite it to improve. That&#8217;s part of conversational marketing. So, in that spirit, I certainly welcome yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie Zinn</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/comment-page-1/#comment-6635</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie Zinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/12/17/why-fifth-third-bank-flunked-press-release-test-from-hubspot/#comment-6635</guid>
		<description>Newt, this is a bit harsh. Why single out and embarrass another P.R. professional when you could have sanitized the release and made the same points? It&#039;s just mean-spirited and could damage the reputation of someone who did not ask for your critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt, this is a bit harsh. Why single out and embarrass another P.R. professional when you could have sanitized the release and made the same points? It&#8217;s just mean-spirited and could damage the reputation of someone who did not ask for your critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
