<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary vs. Obama: It&#8217;s the Content Marketing, Stupid!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/</link>
	<description>How to turn prospects into buyers with content marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:07:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Newt Barrett</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Larry,
You may be right about ruthless.  But after the Feb 26 debate, I&#039;m thinking toothless might be closer to the truth. We shall see.
Newt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry,<br />
You may be right about ruthless.  But after the Feb 26 debate, I&#8217;m thinking toothless might be closer to the truth. We shall see.<br />
Newt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Parsons</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/#comment-798</guid>
		<description>The explanation makes so much sense, but never leave until the &quot;fat lady sings&quot;...Hil appears ruthless, and has even more ruthless &quot;friends&quot;.  &quot;Ruthless&quot; sometimes trumps trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explanation makes so much sense, but never leave until the &#8220;fat lady sings&#8221;&#8230;Hil appears ruthless, and has even more ruthless &#8220;friends&#8221;.  &#8220;Ruthless&#8221; sometimes trumps trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newt Barrett</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John.  I made the correction. I was trying to show only my content marketing leaning.
One commentator offered an interesting insight about leadership skills, noting that,if we are to judge by the success of Obama&#039;s campaign vs. Hillary&#039;s, we can be pretty certain that he will be more effective as President--from day one! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John.  I made the correction. I was trying to show only my content marketing leaning.<br />
One commentator offered an interesting insight about leadership skills, noting that,if we are to judge by the success of Obama&#8217;s campaign vs. Hillary&#8217;s, we can be pretty certain that he will be more effective as President&#8211;from day one! <img src='http://contentmarketingtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sprecher</title>
		<link>http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sprecher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentmarketingtoday.com/2008/02/21/hillary-vs-obama-its-the-content-marketing-stupid/#comment-737</guid>
		<description>Newt:

Rock on. You&#039;ve hit Hillary&#039;s nail right on the head. Obama has certainly has the most effective, most persuasive, content-driven website and e-marketing campaign to ever come to presidential politics. For instance, the evening of his first win, at roughly 9 pm est, I received an email with this subject line: Turn on the Television. When you opened the email, it reported that Senator Obama had just won Iowa and that I (as a supporter, alright, I admit it) should go to the television to celebrate the historic event. With every turn, with every positive, with every attack, emails go out -- as another one did today, outlining Clinton&#039;s &quot;100 select, bigwig contributor campaign&quot; versus Obama&#039;s 1,000,000 citizens and no special interest funding (subject line: &quot;100 versus 1,000,000&quot;).  Now, while great branding and marketing, strategies and tactics, messaging and delivery can polish mirrors to create the illusion of content, ultimately, the consumer finds the truth. Obama&#039;s success and his ultimate nomination as the Democratic candidate for president will occur because of the truth of his content -- his intelligence, poise, persuasion, leadership, vision, integrity, honesty and ability to inspire.

PS Your paragraph that leads with &quot;Unfortunately&quot; should probably read: &quot;Unfortunately for Hillary.&quot; Unless your true political leaning is coming through. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt:</p>
<p>Rock on. You&#8217;ve hit Hillary&#8217;s nail right on the head. Obama has certainly has the most effective, most persuasive, content-driven website and e-marketing campaign to ever come to presidential politics. For instance, the evening of his first win, at roughly 9 pm est, I received an email with this subject line: Turn on the Television. When you opened the email, it reported that Senator Obama had just won Iowa and that I (as a supporter, alright, I admit it) should go to the television to celebrate the historic event. With every turn, with every positive, with every attack, emails go out &#8212; as another one did today, outlining Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;100 select, bigwig contributor campaign&#8221; versus Obama&#8217;s 1,000,000 citizens and no special interest funding (subject line: &#8220;100 versus 1,000,000&#8243;).  Now, while great branding and marketing, strategies and tactics, messaging and delivery can polish mirrors to create the illusion of content, ultimately, the consumer finds the truth. Obama&#8217;s success and his ultimate nomination as the Democratic candidate for president will occur because of the truth of his content &#8212; his intelligence, poise, persuasion, leadership, vision, integrity, honesty and ability to inspire.</p>
<p>PS Your paragraph that leads with &#8220;Unfortunately&#8221; should probably read: &#8220;Unfortunately for Hillary.&#8221; Unless your true political leaning is coming through. <img src='http://contentmarketingtoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
